Posts

Showing posts from 2019

Eight years for 41 homes

A planning commissioner in the Tri Valley, one of the better ones I've seen, remarked in a planning commission hearing a few months ago, that this project was the first project he looked at when he was appointed and now it's the last project he's looking at before he terms out, eight years later. There has been so much tension and fighting between the developer and NIMBYs that it has taken eight years to get this otherwise straightforward project approved. He also remarked that the developers have given huge compromises to the opposition while the opposition hasn't given an inch. The project started off in architecture in 2011, with the intent to build 78 homes between 2300 and 3200 square feet on a slight knoll, overlooking the valley. Immediately, the community in the area came out of the woodwork with complaints. It's too dense! - it's less dense than the surrounding community. We loved walking up the hill to watch the fireworks! - this has always been...

Affordable housing is unaffordable

Image
Specifically, I will be writing about the funding of affordable housing via the taxation of market rate housing and how that affects housing prices. It's true that in some instances, affordable housing funds come from the general fund which is funded via other taxes, but that kind of goes beyond the scope of this blog. For the purposes of this post, when I say "affordable housing", I specifically mean a price controlled unit sold lower than market value, and not innovative market rate housing like tiny homes or creative uses of space in a condo. There are generally two ways developers may provide affordable housing: Provide below market rate units within the development. Occasionally, this will come with perks like density bonuses, but many times, it's just mandated by the city that the developer must provide a certain percentage.  Pay an in-lieu fee to the city, which varies by city. For an example of the first method, we go to a sprawling city in the East Bay...

Illegal porches and stoops

Image
Porches can be wonderful spaces to hang out in. It's an outdoor space where you can sit and read the newspaper with a cup of coffee while watching your neighbors walk around. It also helps activate the street with human activity instead of a street being devoid of life. They do need to be a certain depth to be really functional and comfortable to sit and relax in, which we've found to start at around seven feet in depth. However, even if you only have space for something less than that, it's preferable to just a stoop. You can place some decor and potted plants there, have space for visitors to stand in the cover from the rain, or build a small fort to pelt passers by with water balloons. I'll be the judge of that, says the Livermore development code  (566 page PDF; happy reading). You want an integrated porch in your new house in Livermore (4.03.050). Great! Due to the depth of your lot and your housing needs, you can only get a six foot deep porch, which you decid...

Your house is too tall underground

Image
Many jurisdictions will impose height limits on houses in order to keep densities the way the elected city councils want them. Many times, it's for the livability of neighborhoods so people don't build five story condos next to single story houses. Sometimes, it's for aesthetics so people don't build townhomes in a rural setting. Occasionally, it's for pragmatic reasons so someone doesn't, say, build a tall building in front of an airport runway. Sometimes the code will measure from the finished grade to the top of a ridge or parapet wall. Other times, the code will set a limit to the midpoint between the eave and ridge. When the grades are sloped, the code often will prescribe an average or midpoint of the grades. Unfortunately, many times the code isn't perfectly clear or well defined. One of my colleagues ran into this issue with a planner. The code specified a height limit, but although it wasn't specified, these height limits are pretty mu...

Inability to get out of your own way (Part 3)

Continued from Part 2 HOW long?? Although we worked on the design for two years to gain approval from the DRB, we were always viewed as the "rookies" on the design team. The landscape architect had been with the project for years before us. And we learned that there was a local community group that had been pushing for this project for twenty years. Twenty?! I thought I had misheard the number, but she went on about how when she started the project, her kids were still in grade school and now they've gone off on their careers. Twenty years. I was still in high school then, hoping to get accepted into a good school to study architecture. Bill Clinton was the president. Tech stocks were booming as people began to discover the internet as AOL, the largest ISP, served via 56k baud modems, downloading one mp3 song in 20 minutes. No cell phones had cameras yet. I've since graduated college, earning a Bachelor of Architecture and practiced in the field for over a decad...